Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cardinell v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 14, 1994No. 32, September Term, 1992Published

1DissentEldridge, Judge

I agree with the majority that Code (1974, 1989 Repl.Vol.), § 12-302(c)(2) of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article, does not authorize the State’s appeal in this case. I totally disagree with the majority’s holding that “[t]he State does, however, enjoy a common law right to appeal under these circumstances.” By finding a “common law right to appeal” under circumstances where the pertinent statutory provisions do not provide a right of appeal, the majority has overruled a multitude of Maryland cases and ignored settled legal principles. Moreover, neither Maryland history nor the cases…

2Cases cited101 opinions

  1. Kaczorowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  2. Adler v. American Standard Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  3. Harrison v. Montgomery County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  4. Shell Oil Co. v. Supervisor of AssessmentsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  5. State v. BuchananCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1821

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API