Legal Opinion

Cardinell v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 14, 1994No. 32, September Term, 1992Published

1Opinion of the Court

335 Md. 381 (1994)

644 A.2d 11

LAURA BETH CARDINELL

v.

STATE OF MARYLAND.

No. 32, September Term, 1992.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

July 14, 1994.

Mark Colvin, Asst. Public Defender (Stephen E. Harris, Public Defender and Julia Doyle Bernhardt, Asst. Public Defender, both on brief), Baltimore, for petitioner.

Mary Ann Ince, Asst. Atty. Gen. (J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Atty. Gen., both on brief), Baltimore, for respondent.

Argued before MURPHY, C.J., and ELDRIDGE, RODOWSKY, McAULIFFE,[*] CHASANOW, KARWACKI and BELL, JJ.

McAULIFFE, Judge.

This case involves two principal questions: did the trial judge have…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited136 opinions

  1. United States v. AddonizioSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Kaczorowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  3. Ex Parte United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Adler v. American Standard Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  5. Harrison v. Montgomery County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983

131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API