Legal Opinion

Kearney v. Jandernoa

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided September 29, 1997No. 1:95-cv-00823PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

QUIST, District Judge.

This case is a shareholder’s derivative action against officers, directors, and shareholders of Perrigo Company (“Perrigo”), and against certain underwriters involved in the October 1993 secondary offering of 13,000,-000 shares of Perrigo stock. Plaintiff, Keith M. Kearney, brings this shareholder’s deriva tive suit on behalf of Perrigo alleging in his amended verified derivative complaint intentional and negligent breach of duties in connection with the October 1993 secondary-public offering. Plaintiff further alleges that the underwriting agreement entered into…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Total Containment, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Hoevenaar v. LazaroffDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API