State v. Nelson
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SILAK, Justice.
This is an appeal from the Snake River Basin Adjudication (SRBA), regarding whether General Provisions concerning Basin 34 should be included in the SRBA court’s partial decree. On January 16, 1996, the SRBA court designated basin-wide issue 5B as “[wjhether General Provisions 2 and 4 in the Amended Director’s Report for Reporting Area 1 (Basin 3k) are necessary for the definition of the rights or for the efficient administration of the water rights.” The SRBA court affirmed the Special Master’s decision that General Provisions 2 and 4 from the Amended Director’s Report for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Doolittle ex rel. Doolittle v. Meridian Joint School District No. 2Idaho Supreme Court · 1996
- Olson v. Idaho Department of Water ResourcesIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
- Crow v. CarlsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
- Stethem v. SkinnerIdaho Supreme Court · 1905
- A & B Irrigation District v. Idaho Conservation LeagueIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
3Cited by16 opinions
- A & B Irrigation District v. Idaho Department of Water ResourcesIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
- City of Pocatello v. IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
- Eden v. State (In Re Srba Case No. 39576 Subase No. 37-00864)Idaho Supreme Court · 2018
- City of Blackfoot v. Gary SpackmanIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
- Idaho Ground Water Appropriators v. Dept of Water Resources (42775) and City of Pocatello v. Rangen, Inc. (42836)Idaho Supreme Court · 2016
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.