Legal Opinion
Doolittle ex rel. Doolittle v. Meridian Joint School District No. 2
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided June 21, 1996No. 21985PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McDEVITT, Chief Justice.
Respondent, Brad Doolittle (Brad) is a child with hearing impairments, who qualifies for services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (I.D.E.A.) 20 U.S.CA §§ 1400-1420 (West 1990). The purpose of I.D.E.A is to assure that all children with disabilities have available to them a “free appropriate public education which emphasizes special education and related services designed to meet their unique needs....” 20 U.S.C.A § 1400(c) (West 1995). Brad, by and through his parents Michael and Jeanette Doolittle, claim that the Meridian Joint School District…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- School Committee of the Town of Burlington v. Department of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Florence County School District Four v. Carter Ex Rel. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Board of County Commissioners v. Idaho Health Facilities AuthorityIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
- Epeldi v. EngelkingIdaho Supreme Court · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- In Re: Gaston & Snow, Debtor, Alfred J. Bianco, as Plan Administrator to the Estate of Gaston & Snow v. Robert A. Erkins & Bernadine ErkinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Bouten Construction Co. v. H.F. Magnuson Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999
- Swanson v. SwansonIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
- Hensley v. West Virginia Department of Health & Human ResourcesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. HoyleIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.