Legal Opinion

Antognoli & Co. v. Miller

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 9, 1902PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Complaint. Before Judge Henry. Floyd superior'court. September 5, 1902.

1Opinion of the CourtSimmons, C. J.

A petition was filed by Clarence L. Miller, in which the, firm of A. M. Antognoli & Company was named as de*622fendant, and in which a promissory note for $188, and a due-bill for $45, both signed in the name of that firm and payable to the plaintiff, were declared upon-. An answer was filed by the defendant partnership, in which it set up two defenses: (1) that payment of the note had been made to H. E. Miller, who was the authorized agent of the plaintiff to collect it; and (2) that the plaintiff was only the nominal holder of the note and due-bill, H. E. Miller being the real owner thereof,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Howard & Soule v. RiceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wardlaw v. FrederickCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  2. Dibble v. LawSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  3. Dixie Broadcasting Corp. v. RiversSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  4. Dixie Broadcasting Corp. v. RiversSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  5. Roland v. WatsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API