Wardlaw v. Frederick
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Action for money had and received; from city court of Columbus —Judge Tigner. June 11, 1913.
1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.
1. Where an answer is demurred to on the general ground that the allegations thereof are irrelevant and insufficient and do not set up any matter of defense, and the demurrer fails specifically to point out in what particular they are irrelevant and insufficient, and it appears that some of the paragraphs demurred to do set up matters which are relevant and material, in testing the relevancy and sufficiency of matters of defense thus set up, the facts alleged in all the paragraphs will be considered together; and if, in the light of the allegations embraced in all the paragraphs, there is a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Southern Railway Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
- Antognoli & Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
3Cited by8 opinions
- A. G. Boone Co. v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Midland Properties Co. v. FarmerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- State Mutual Insurance Co. v. HarmonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
- Horne-Wilson, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Denny v. D. J. D., Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.