Legal Opinion
Dibble v. Law
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided February 20, 1914PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Complaint. Before Judge Rawlings. Jenkins superior court. December 30, 1912.
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
In this case Sarah F. Dibble, as administratrix of the estate of Lucy Jane Bruce, and Helen Loomis brought suit against Clara E. Law on a certain promissory note for $1,000 principal, besides interest and attorney’s fees, which was secured by a deed to land. The defendant filed her answer to the petition, averring payment in full of the note to F. L. Seales, at Waynesboro, Georgia, a member of the law firm of Lawson & Scales, who it was claimed were agents of the plaintiffs. A verdict was rendered for the defendant. To the judgment of the court, overruling a motion for a new trial, the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bank of the University v. TuckSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Howard & Soule v. RiceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
- Antognoli & Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
3Cited by7 opinions
- Harbaugh's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. FranklinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Northside Building & Investment Co. v. Finance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Universalist Convention v. GuestSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Futch v. Royster Guano Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.