Legal Opinion

Baird v. Pace

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 31, 1987No. 2 CA-CV 87-0140PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HATHAWAY, Judge.

This is an appeal by an attorney (Pace), defendant in a legal malpractice action brought by appellees (Baird). In 1980, pursuant to a sales agreement, Baird sold a liquor license to Elmer Carrier and Pamela Maxwell. He received a promissory note from the purchasers, and the parties filed a Statement of Legal and Equitable Interest with the Arizona Department of Liquor Licenses and Control, in accordance with A.R.S. § 4-112(B). Baird’s attorney, Pace, did not file a financing statement with the Secretary of State. In 1981, Carrier entered into a lease agreement with…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Smith v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Barmat v. John and Jane Doe Partners ADArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Bowman v. DohertySupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  4. Sarti v. UdallArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Martin v. BurnsArizona Supreme Court · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Toy v. KatzCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  2. Collins v. Miller & Miller, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  3. Kaufman v. JesserDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2012
  4. Bellemare v. Lemon LawCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021
  5. Beynon v. TREZZACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API