Legal Opinion

State v. Whitney

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1945PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarlow, J.

The principal assignments of error relied upon by the defendant, Frank Louis Whitney, are: (1) That the court should have granted defendant’s motion for adjournment; (2) that there is not sufficient credible evidence to support the verdict of the jury; (3) that defendant did not have a fair trial.

Defendant was arrested September 4, 1943, and after a preliminary examination was arraigned in municipal court on September 21, 1943, at which time he had no attorney. The case was adjourned until September 24th to enable defendant to obtain an attorney and fix a day certain for trial. On September…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miller v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  2. O'Neil v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Mainville v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Johnson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  5. State v. ChristiansenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Galloway v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Elam v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Baldwin v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  4. State v. MoffettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  5. State v. DriscollWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API