Legal Opinion

O'Neil v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1941PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The plaintiffs in error, Frank L. O'Neil and Eugene Klink, were brought to trial on an information charging each of them with violating sec. 340.45, Stats., by maliciously threatening to prosecute Clara Lehman on a charge of criminal libel with the intent thereby to extort $1,400 from her. The jury found both defendants guilty of the charge alleged, and the court entered judgments approving the convictions and imposing a fine of $500 on Klink and $100 on O'Neil,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. State v. GuilfoyleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  2. Commonwealth v. CorcoranMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  3. People v. BeggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Patnode v. WestenhaverWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Wilson v. NoonanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. NutleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Bautista v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  4. Bartlett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
  5. Michael L. Piaskowski v. John BettCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API