Legal Opinion
State v. Driscoll
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided February 3, 1953PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.
The defendants contend that the evidence did not establish a violation of sec. 351.20, Stats., for the reason that such statute has application only to that class of persons who stand in loco parentis to the minor to whose delinquency they have contributed. Sec. 351.20 (1) provides:
“In all cases where any child shall be a dependent, neglected, or delinquent child, as defined by the statutes of this state, the parent or parents, legal guardian, or person having the custody of such child, or any other person, responsible for such child being dependent, neglected, or delinquent, through wilful…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. HintzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- State v. ReslerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- McLain v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
- Komp v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
- O'Keefe v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gleason v. GuzmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- State v. CarprueWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. HerringtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. JohnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- State v. SelbachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.