Richardson v. Shelby
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from the District Court of Canadian County.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
McAtee, J.:
The plaintiff below, plaintiff in error .here, filed his complaint in replevin in the district court for Oklahoma county, setting forth that he was •the owner and legally entitled to the possesion of certain personal property, consisting of one Massillion separator, truck and stacker and other personal property, by virtue of two chattel mortgages and a release from the mortgagor to him of all interest and rights in the property. The defendant filed his general demurrer to the complaint, which was overruled. The defendant thereupon filed his…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Smith & Co. v. McLeanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
- Graham v. State ex rel. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- Ex parte WallsIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Martin v. CaubleIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Arnold v. PotterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Washington County Abstract Company v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Randall Co. v. GlendenningSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Commercial Security Bank of Ogden v. Chimes PressUtah Supreme Court · 1935
- Gripe v. SinorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- St. Louis Carbonating & Mfg. Co. v. Lookeba State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.