Figart v. Halderman

Halderman and Brower instituted this action to reform and foreclose a mortgage, executed by Michael Wagaman. Figart, the appellant, claims to be the owner of the real estate in controversy, by purchase from the mortgagor.

The case is here for the second time. Upon the former appeal, a judgment rendered in favor of the appellees was reversed upon the ground that the complaint was bad, because it did not set out a copy of the mortgage upon which the action was founded. Figart v. Halderman, 59 Ind. 424. We are now asked to reverse the judgment rendered upon the second trial, because, as…