Legal Opinion

Pope v. Perdue

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 3, 2018No. 16-4217PublishedCited by 108 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kanne, Circuit Judge.

Various statutes vest the Federal Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") with the authority to make decisions that affect aspects of a federal inmate's sentence. In Jermel Pope's case, the BOP used its authority to prolong his federal sentence. Pope argues that the BOP erroneously wielded that authority and asks that we reconsider the BOP decisions that extended his sentence. Pope has completed his term of imprisonment and is now serving a period of federal supervised release, so we must also consider whether Pope's habeas corpus petition is now moot because he is no longer housed in…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Ponzi v. FessendenSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Setser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by108 opinions

  1. United States v. Gene SuttonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  2. Ray Fuller v. Matthew G. WhitakerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  3. Kevin Pettis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2025
  4. United States v. TrotterDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2018
  5. Julio Davila v. Nicholas DemlSupreme Court of Vermont · 2025

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API