Legal Opinion
Hooker v. Sundquist
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
Decided December 19, 2002PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · FarmerDavid R. Farmer, J.
in which W. FRANK CRAWFORD, P.J., W.S., and ROBERT W. WEDEMEYER, Sp. J., joined.
This case involves an appeal from an order denying a motion for Rule 11 sanctions. We reverse and remand.
Plaintiff (Appellee) John Jay Hooker (Mr. Hooker) filed a complaint on December 13, 2001, against Governor Don Sund-quist, individually and in his official capacity, and Lieutenant Governor John Wilder, Speaker Jimmy Naifeh, and Attorney General Paul Summers, in their official capacities. The complaint alleged that Governor Sundquist had violated Art. X, § 3 of the Tennessee Constitution during his 1998…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2000
- Andrews v. BibleTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
- Krug v. KrugCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
- Boyd v. Prime Focus, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
- Crutchfield v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by20 opinions
- Brown v. ShappleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008
- In Re HookerTennessee Supreme Court · 2011
- Marshall v. Cintas Corp., Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2007
- In Re Estate of James Kemmler RogersCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2018
- CNX Gas Company, LLC v. Miller Petroleum, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2011
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.