Farnum v. . Garner Print Works and Bleachery
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from a judgment, entered July 21, 1918, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and directing a dismissal of the complaint in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff through the negligence of defendant, his employer. Defendant operated a bleachery plant.
Read the full summary
Appeal from a judgment, entered July 21, 1918, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and directing a dismissal of the complaint in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff through the negligence of defendant, his employer. Defendant operated a bleachery plant. Plaintiff, a young man nineteen years of age, was employed as helper on a machine known as a starch mangle. While thus employed he was caught in the machine and so…
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
■ Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Collin, Hogan, Pound, McLaughlin, Andrews and Elkus, JJ.
2Cited by8 opinions
- Maas v. Cornell UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Thompson v. Maimonides Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Cifolo v. General Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Donald M. Posegate, and Ida J. Posegate, Husband and Wife v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
- delBusto v. E. I. Dupont deNemours & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.