Legal Opinion

Maas v. Cornell University

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 7, 1999PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Carpinello, J.

The relevant facts are fully set forth in our decision on a *3prior appeal in this matter (245 AD2d 728). There, we affirmed the dismissal of six causes of action in a complaint filed by plaintiff, a tenured professor, against defendant, his employer. The current appeal stems from Supreme Court’s order granting defendant summary judgment on the remaining two causes of action, each sounding in negligence, on the ground that they are barred by the exclusivity provisions of the Workers’ Compensation Law.

The thrust of plaintiff’s remaining claims is that defendant…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Burlew v. American Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Ross v. Mitsui Fudosan, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  3. Jones Lang Wootton USA v. LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRaeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Bradley v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
  5. Comeau v. WrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Maas v. Cornell UniversityNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. D & L Holdings, LLC v. RCG Goldman Co., LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. Baje Realty Corp. v. CutlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. Ziccarelli v. NYU Hospitals CenterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
  5. Paisley v. Coin Device Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API