Legal Opinion
LaMadrid v. Hegstrom
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided December 27, 1984No. Civ. 84-1269-PAPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PANNER, Chief Judge.
On October 11, 1984, plaintiffs Eufemia LaMadrid, Joey LaMadrid, Debbie Viskov, and Jeremy Gerber filed a complaint requesting a temporary restraining order, a preliminary injunction, and permanent injunctive and declaratory relief. Defendants are Leo Hegstrom, Director, Department of Human Resources of the State of Oregon (DHR), Keith Putman, Administrator, Adult and Family Services Division of the State of Oregon, and Margaret Heckler, the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). Plaintiffs also moved for class certification. Pending final…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Perrin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Tommie E. Watkins v. Donald Blinzinger, Dorothy Davis v. Gregory ColerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Reyes v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- In Re Agent Orange Product Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1985
- Lamadrid v. HegstromCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Payne Ex Rel. Payne v. ToanDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.