Legal Opinion

Matter of Roth

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 16, 1995Published

1Opinion of the Court

140 N.J. 430 (1995)

658 A.2d 1264

IN THE MATTER OF WALTER L. ROTH, JR., AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued February 28, 1995.

Decided June 16, 1995.

Walton W. Kingsbery, III, Deputy Ethics Counsel, argued the cause on behalf of Office of Attorney Ethics.

Charles J. Sprigman, Jr., argued the cause for respondent.

2Per curiam

Following an investigative audit conducted in May 1991, the Office of Attorney Ethics (OAE) filed a seven-count complaint with the District XIV Ethics Committee against respondent, Walter L. Roth, Jr. Respondent was charged with four counts of knowing misappropriation…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited20 opinions

  1. In Re WilsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. Matter of NoonanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  3. In Re SearsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
  4. In Re JacobSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  5. Matter of FleischerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API