Legal Opinion
Gerstein v. Fisher
The Superior Court of New York City
Decided October 15, 1895PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Appeal from' order denying defendant’s motion for leave to serve a." supplemental answer to the complaint. See opinion below, 12 Mise. Rep. 211.
1Per curiam
The order appealed from should be affirmed on the opinion filed by the learned judge below. In view of the decisions in Collins v. Hydorn, 135 N. Y. 320, and Furlong v. Banta, 80 Hun, 248, the case of Anderson v. Third Ave. R. R. Co., 9 Daly, 487, cannot be followed, and the decision of Featherson v. Newburgh & C. Turnpike Co., 24 N. Y. Supp. 603, has no application.
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
Present: Freedmah and McAdam, JJ.
- Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Collins v. . HydornNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Featherson v. President of Newburgh & Cocheton Turnpike Co.New York Supreme Court · 1893
- Furlong v. BantaNew York Supreme Court · 1894
- Anderson v. Third Avenue RailroadNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1881
3Cited by1 opinion
- Marcomo Stevedoring Corp. v. NathansonNew York Supreme Court · 1951