Legal Opinion

McNichols v. Dept. of Fish and Wildlife

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 6, 2021No. A172135PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

369 Argued and submitted October 30, 2020, affirmed. January 6, 2021 Michael McNICHOLS, an individual, Petitioner-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE, an agency of the State of Oregon, Respondent-Respondent, and Curt MELCHER, in his capacity as the Director of that same agency, Respondent below, and CANBY DEVELOPMENT, LLC, Intervenor-Respondent. Clackamas County Circuit Court 19CV09933; A172135

482 P3d 208

Plaintiff seeks to challenge a settlement agreement between the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) and Canby Development, LLC (Canby Development). The settlement…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Couey v. AtkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Morgan v. Sisters School District 6Oregon Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Gruber v. Lincoln Hospital DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Local No. 290 v. Oregon Department of Environmental QualityOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  5. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals v. Institutional Animal Care & Use CommitteeOregon Supreme Court · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. IBEW Local 89 v. WallanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  2. Lee (House of R.E.A.P.) v. Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  3. Hayes Oyster Co. v. DEQCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  4. IBEW Local 89 v. WallanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API