Legal Opinion

Butler v. Apfel

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 14, 1998No. 97-15497PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Per curiam

Robert Burdett Butler challenges the constitutionality of 42 U.S.C. § 402(x) which mandates the suspension of his social security benefits because he is a convicted felon currently incarcerated in prison. Butler claims that § 402(x) violates the due process and equal protection clauses of the Fifth Amendment and acts as an invalid ex post facto law and bill of attainder in violation of Article 9, Section 1. The district court dismissed Butler’s complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. We have jurisdiction pursuant…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Nixon v. Administrator of General ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Taniguchi v. SchultzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. In Re R. Greg BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  3. Gill v. Office of Personnel ManagementDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
  4. Houston v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. LujanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API