Legal Opinion
United States v. Lujan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 2, 2007No. 02-30237PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SILVERMAN, Circuit Judge:
Lisa Renee Lujan appeals from the district court’s order authorizing the probation office to demand the collection of a blood sample as a condition of her supervised release, as mandated by the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000 (“DNA Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 14135-14135e. She alleges that the Act violates the Fourth Amendment and the Ex Post Facto Clause, that it is an unconstitutional bill of attainder, and that it contravenes separation of powers. We reject these constitutional challenges and affirm.
I. Background
On May 10, 1999, Lujan pleaded guilty to one…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Nixon v. Administrator of General ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Selective Service System v. Minnesota Public Interest Research GroupSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Thomas Cameron KincadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. George C. HookCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ileto v. Glock, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Michael LaursenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. PoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Denise Schmidt v. Contra Costa CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Ileto v. Glock, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.