Legal Opinion
United Shoe Machinery Corp. v. Industrial Shoe Machinery Corp.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided November 26, 1963No. Civ. A. No. 61-798PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WYZANSKI, District Judge.
A. INTRODUCTION
I. This is a suit for infringement of three patents owned by United involving toe lasting machines as used in the shoe manufacturing industry: Patent No. 2,926,367, relating to a power assisted toe lasting machine; Patent No. 2,986,-753, relating to an upwiping composite Teflon-steel toe band for such a machine; and Patent No. 3,061,852, directed to a wiper operated trimming knife for such a machine.
2. Defendant asserted three counterclaims.
3. The first counterclaim challenges the validity of all the claims of all three patents in suit.
4. The second…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1953
- Universal Oil Products Co. v. Globe Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
- BG Corporation v. Walter Kidde & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
- Robertson Rock Bit Co. v. Hughes Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Amgen, Inc. v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
- Scully Signal Company v. Electronics Corporation of America, Scully Signal Company v. Electronics Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
- United Shoe MacHinery Corporation v. Industrial Shoe MacHinery CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1964