In re Flonase Antitrust Litigation
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.
I. Background
Direct and Indirect Purchasers of a steroid nasal spray containing the active ingredient fluticasone propionate (“FP”), along with Roxane Laboratories, Inc. (“Roxane”), a generic FP manufacturer, have brought actions against Defendant Smith-Kline Beeeham Corporation, doing business as GlaxoSmithKline PLC (“GSK”), the manufacturer of the branded version of FP (“Flonase”), alleging various violations arising from GSK’s conduct delaying market entry of generic FP. In its defense, GSK asserts, inter alia, that its conduct— particularly the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Tillman v. C.R. Bard, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2015
- United Food & Commercial Workers Local 1776 & Participating Emp'rs Health & Welfare Fund v. Teikoku Pharma United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Puerto Rico Telephone Co. v. San Juan Cable Co.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2016
- In re Flonase Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.District Court, D. Delaware · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.