Legal Opinion

Matter of Marriage of Sleeper

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1999No. S43959PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKulongoski, J.

In this marital dissolution action, the circuit court awarded custody of the parties’ two children to husband. Wife appealed, assigning error to that award of custody. She denied that husband was the biological father of the children and argued that, because the custody dispute involved a biological parent and a person who is not a biological parent, the “compelling reasons” standard announced in Hruby and Hruby, 304 Or 500, 516, 748 P2d 57 (1987), discussed below, should be used in determining custody. Husband argued that the Hruby standard was not applicable, because wife was estopped from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Owens v. MaassOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Matter of Marriage of DentonOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  4. In the Matter of Marriage of Hruby and HrubyOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Nolan v. Mt. Bachelor, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1993

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of O'Donnell-LamontOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Ken Leahy Construction, Inc. v. Cascade General, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1999
  3. In the Matter of Marriage of O'donnell-Lamont and LamontCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. Newton v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. In Re the Marriage of MooreOregon Supreme Court · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API