Legal Opinion · Dissent

Matter of Campbell Sales Co. v. New York State Tax Comm'n

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 3, 1986Published

1DissentKaye, J.

For more than 30 years, Campbell Sales Company (Sales), a New York taxpayer (see, Tax Law § 208 [2]; § 209 [1]), had paid State franchise tax based on its income. Its parent, Campbell Soup (Soup), had not done business here and was not subject to the tax. Now, with no change in Sales’ business or its relations with its parent, Sales is compelled to file a combined report with Soup and its subsidiaries, because they are part of a unitary business, thereby for the first time subjecting the income of Soup and its subsidiaries to New York State franchise tax.

Pursuant to Tax Law § 211 (4) the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. People v. AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. People v. BetheaNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Dougherty v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API