Legal Opinion

Fenton v. Enaharo

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1987No. 86-1443PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue presented by the within appeal is whether the court of appeals correctly concluded that “* * * the Columbus Charter is silent on the subject of layoff, so that appointing authorities in the city of Columbus may lay off employees under appropriate circumstances but that, by virture of Sections 1 and 232 of the Columbus City Charter, appropriate provisions of the Revised Code are applicable to such layoffs, including R.C. 124.03(A) and 124.40(A).”

Section 3, Article XVIII of the Ohio Constitution empowers municipalities to enact requirements for employees which differ from those set…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Dean v. HuddleOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State ex rel. Kohl v. DunipaceOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State Ex Rel. Flask v. CollinsOhio Supreme Court · 1947
  4. State, Ex Rel. Dean v. HuddleOhio Court of Appeals · 1975

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Paluf v. FeneliOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. City of Dayton v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. City of Twinsburg v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. FiskOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. State v. PippenOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API