Legal Opinion
Gano v. Heath
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided April 24, 1877PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Error to Berrien Circuit.
1Opinion of the Court
Cooley, Ch. J:
The plaintiff in error was defendairt in the court below, and the case comes to this court on a finding of facts, of' which the following is a copy:
“The action is brought upon a promissory note of one thousand dollars, signed by Curtis Boughton, George Gano and J. C. Boughton, dated November 20, 1870, and payable with interest at ten per cent, at one year.
*442“The defense set up by Gano was, that he signed the note as surety for O. Boughton, and that when the note became due, Heath, for a valid consideration, extended the time of payment one year, without the knowledge or consent of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Miller v. FinleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Burk v. WebbMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Lovell v. WillardMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Todd v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
3Cited by4 opinions
- First Nat. Bank v. WeidenbeckCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
- Anderson v. DonatoMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Stacey v. FritzlerOregon Supreme Court · 1938
- Union Banking Co. v. Martin's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1897