Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Bell

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1895No. 17,069PublishedCited by 16 opinions

From the Carroll Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCabe, C. J.

— A part of the appellees sued a part of the appellants for partition, of certain real estate in Carroll county, making the other appellees defendants and the other appellants coplaintiffs with themselves. Upon the issues formed, there was a trial by the court without .a jury; and at the request of both parties the court made a special finding of the facts, and stated its conclusions of law thereon. The conclusions of law are assigned for error.

As shown by the facts, John B. Anderson died testate on the first day of June, 1870, owner in fee simple of the real estate in controversy in this…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cope v. CopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Garrigus v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Wiggins v. KeizerIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
  4. Robertson v. BurrellIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Bowman v. ConnIndiana Supreme Court · 1856

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Lewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  2. State ex rel. Western Construction Co. v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Smith v. North Memphis Savings BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1905
  4. United States v. BakerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  5. Stone v. ElliottIndiana Supreme Court · 1914

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API