Legal Opinion

Smith v. North Memphis Savings Bank

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1905PublishedCited by 38 opinions

PROM SHELBY. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Shelby County. — • P. H. Heiskell, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the Court

Mu. Justice Shields

delivered tlie opinion of the Court.

Complainant sues the defendant, as the administrator of Joseph Smith, deceased, for the estate of the decedent remaining in its hands after payment of indebtedness and costs and expenses of administration, claiming, the same as widow and sole distributee of the intestate.

The defendant, answering, admits that it is the administrator of Joseph Smith, deceased, and that it has in its hands a fund due to his distributees, but denies that the complainant is his widow and distributee and entitled to the fund. It admits that it ,ha.s no…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Calhoun v. LittleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. Cargill & Dennis v. Kountze Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Anderson v. BellIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Andrews v. PageTennessee Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Southeastern Aviation, Inc. v. HurdTennessee Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Melton v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948
  3. Kelly v. ConnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1909
  4. State v. KingTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Kinnard v. Tennessee Chemical Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1928

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API