Legal Opinion

People v. Dutro

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 6, 1925No. Docket No. 1241PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAHN, J., pro tem.

Appellants, Arthur Dutro and Marion D. Stuart, were jointly charged by information filed by the district attorney of Los Angeles County with the crime of robbery. From the judgment upon a verdict of guilty, and the order denying their motion for a new trial appellants prosecute this appeal.

Appellant Stuart alone has filed briefs, it being stipulated, however, that the appellant Dutro rests his appeal upon the points and authorities filed on behalf of appellant Stuart.

The complaining witness, one Lionel Gardner, testified that at about 7 o’clock on the evening of October 24,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. NakisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. People v. CastelloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. People v. BlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. People v. FoutsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. KirkesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. People v. CrowlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. People v. CostelloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. People v. WadeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. People v. Prieto CA5California Court of Appeal · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API