Legal Opinion

Delk v. Ford Motor Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 16, 1996No. Nos. 94-6259, 94-6261PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLELAND, District Judge.

These two consolidated class actions challenge the administration of the Supplemental Unemployment Benefit Plan (“SUB Plan”), part of the collective bargaining agreement between Ford Motor Company and the UAW. The Appellants are or were hourly paid UAW union members employed by Ford during the late 1970s and the early 1980s, when Ford and other American automobile manufacturers were experiencing a financial crisis, in part as a result of pressure from foreign competition. The Arthur Appellants worked at Ford’s Louisville Assembly Plant, and the Delk Appellants worked…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Katsaros v. CodyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  3. Paducah Towing Company, Inc. v. Paducah Towing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  4. Stevens v. Employer-Teamsters Joint Council No. 84 Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  5. Marshall v. Glass/Metal Ass'n & Glaziers & Glassworkers Pension PlanDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Terry McDowell Individually and in His Capacity as of the Last Will of Sharon Sidovar v. John Raymond Krawchison Winton Road Chiropractic Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  2. Delk v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API