Emma Katherine Bergstorm v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Bethel, Judge.
*295 Emma Katherine Bergstrom was convicted of DUI under 21 and DUI less safe. She appeals from her convictions, arguing that Georgia's implied consent statute is *85 unconstitutional on its face and as applied to her. Specifically, Bergstrom argues the State failed to prove she voluntarily consented to the state-administered breath test, and the trial court erred in denying her motion to suppress the results of the test. Finding no error, we affirm.
On appeal from a ruling on a motion to suppress, we defer to the trial court's factual findings and credibility determinations, but review…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Olevik v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
- Dean v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- The State v. Baddeley.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
- The State v. Baddeley.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2019