Olevik v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Peterson, Justice.
The Georgia Constitution protects each of us from being forced to incriminate ourself. Unlike the similar right guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, this state constitutional protection applies to more than mere testimony; it also protects us from being forced to perform acts that generate incriminating evidence. This case calls this Court to decide whether this state constitutional protection prohibits law enforcement from compelling *229a person suspected of DUI to blow his deep lung air into a breathalyzer. A nearly unbroken line of precedent…
2Cases cited79 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by149 opinions
- State v. LaneSupreme Court of Georgia · 2020
- Elliott v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
- Cook v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2022
- Willis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2018
- Duke v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
144 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.