Legal Opinion
Miller v. Donovan
United States Court of International Trade
Decided September 26, 1985No. Court 81-7-00855PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RE, Chief Judge:
In this action, plaintiff, on behalf of former employees of the Butte, Anaconda & Pacific Railway Company, seeks review of a final determination by the Secretary of Labor which denied certification of eligibility for benefits under the worker adjustment assistance program of the Trade Act of 1974, tit. II, §§ 221-249, 284, 19 U.S.C. §§ 2271-2321, 2395 (1982). Specifically, the Secretary found that the workers were not eligible for assistance because an increase in imports did not contribute importantly to the closing of either Anaconda Copper Company’s smelter or refinery, and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Grannis v. OrdeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Atkins v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Stidham v. United States Department of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
- Former Employees of Rohm & Haas Co. v. ChaoUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
- Former Employees of Bass Enterprises Production Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of America v. BrockUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
- Bunker Ltd. Partnership v. BrockUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.