Legal Opinion
Bunker Ltd. Partnership v. Brock
United States Court of International Trade
Decided May 17, 1988No. Court 87-02-00309PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TSOUCALAS, Judge:
Plaintiff, Bunker Limited Partnership, on behalf of the former employees of Crescent Silver Mine, Incorporated of Big Creek and Kellogg, Idaho, brings this action to contest a final determination by the Secretary of Labor (“Secretary”) denying Crescent’s employees eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance under the Trade Act of 1974, §§ 221-249, 284, 19 U.S.C. §§ 2271-2321, 2395 (1982 & Supp. IV 1986) (hereinafter the “Trade Act”). The Secretary concluded that increased imports did not “contribute importantly” to the declines in production experienced at…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Donna Kelley v. Secretary, U.S. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- American Lamb Company v. The United States, and New Zealand Meat Products Board, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Exxon Corp. v. Department of EnergyDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1981
- Tenneco Oil Co. v. Department of EnergyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Western Conference of Teamsters v. BrockUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
- Former Employees of Chevron USA, Inc. v. United States Secretary of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- Former Employees of Health-Tex, Inc. v. U.S. Secretary of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
- Former Employees of Spinnaker Coating Maine, Inc. v. ChaoUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
- Former Employees of Spinnaker Coating Maine, Inc. v. ChaoUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003