Legal Opinion

State v. Traffic Telephone Workers

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided September 10, 1948No. Docket 158/37PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The bill was filed by the Attorney-General to enforce the provisions of chapter 38 of the laws of 1946, R.S. 34:13B, as amended and supplemented by chapters 47 and 75 of the laws of 1947, R.S. 34:13B-13, c., and of executive measures taken pursuant thereto. Before the suit was brought to final hearing, the labor dispute between the defendants New Jersey Bell Telephone Company and the Traffic Telephone Workers Federation was settled, and no injunction is needed, and therefore none will be granted. General Leather, c., v. Luggage, c., Local No.49, 119 N.J. Eq. 432; 121 N.J. Eq. 101. The State…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chas. Wolff Packing Co. v. Court of Industrial RelationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Toledo, Peoria & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Wilson v. NewSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. State Ex Rel. State Board of Milk Control v. Newark Milk Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  5. McCran v. Public Service Railway Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rider v. JulianSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  2. Nj State Bar Ass'n v. Northern Nj Mtg. Assoc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API