Legal Opinion

McAuley v. Brooker

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 18, 2017No. 17 NO 0445PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGES: Hon. Carol Ann Robb, Hon. Cheryl L. Waite, Hon. Mary DeGenaro

OPINION

ROBB, P.J.

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-Appellant Gudrun Ann McAuley appeals the decision of Noble County Common Pleas Court granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellees Donald Brooker, Roger Gantz, Shirley Gantz, Sidney Karin, Jack Morris, and Catherine Morris. There are two issues raised in this appeal.

{¶ 2} The first issue is whether the reservation in the 1961 deed for oil, gas, and mineral interest owned by Cora retained the interest for Cora's heirs, or was that interest conveyed with the surface estate in 1961…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Alexander v. Buckeye Pipe Line Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Comer v. RiskoOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Skivolocki v. East Ohio Gas Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Illinois Controls, Inc. v. LanghamOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Long Beach Ass'n v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Miller v. MellottOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. Crum v. YoderOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. Scarapelli v. YoungOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. D S C Ents., L.L.C. v. Ascent Utica Minerals, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2026
  5. Jurenovich v. Trumbull Mem. Hosp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API