Jones v. Illinois Department of Rehabilitation Services
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FLAUM, District Judge:
This matter comes before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, each motion is granted in part and denied in part.
The parties have stipulated to the facts. Plaintiff is a deaf person and therefore is a handicapped individual within the meaning of section 7(7) 1 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. §§ 701-794 (1976), as amended by Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1974, Pub.L.No. 93-516, 88 Stat. 1617 (codified in scattered sections of 29 U.S.C. (1976)), Rehabilitation Act Extension of 1976, Pub.L.No.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Hans v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Gregory C. Mallett v. Wisconsin Division of Vocational Rehabilitation and Judy R. Norman-NunneryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Marshall v. SwitzerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Davis v. FlexmanDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1999
- Ryans v. NEW JERSEY COM'N FOR THE BLIND, ETC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1982
- McGuire v. SwitzerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.