Legal Opinion
Davis v. Flexman
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided August 23, 1999No. C-3-96-394PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING IN PART AND OVERRULING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #41): PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #40) OVERRULED; CONFERENCE CALL SET
RICE, Chief Judge.
This matter comes before the Court upon the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 41) and Plaintiff Joanne Voelkel’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. # 40). The Defendants seek summary judgment on the Plaintiffs’ eleven-count amended Complaint (Doc. # SO), which alleges violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12181, et seq.…
2Cases cited74 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Lesley v. Hee Man ChieCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Landskroner v. LandskronerOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
- Vives v. FajardoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- City of Findlay v. Hotels.Com, L.P.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006
- Taylor v. Altoona Area School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.