Legal Opinion
People v. Yanez
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 3, 1995No. E013882PublishedCited by 5 opinions
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McKINSTER, J.
Raising a variety of sentencing errors, a criminal defendant appeals from the judgment entered after he pleaded guilty to receiving stolen property. Finding merit in some of his contentions, we reverse part of the judgment.
Factual and Procedural Background
A felony complaint charges the defendant with violating Penal Code section 496 1 by receiving and holding a 1978 Chevrolet El Camino, knowing the vehicle to be stolen. The defendant pleaded guilty on the condition that he would be placed on probation.
In her report, the probation officer stated that the defendant said that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Pfingsten v. WestenhaverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Rhodes v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1921
- Hand Electronics, Inc. v. Snowline Joint Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Smith v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. Alexander A.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- People v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- In Re DinaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- People v. Dina V.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- People v. StanleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010