Legal Opinion

Carr v. Guerard

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 11, 2005No. 26011PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice PLEICONES:

This is a fraudulent-transfer case based on the Statute of Elizabeth.1 Appellant Carr (Carr) commenced the action on January 11, 2002, alleging that Respondent Edward P. Guerard, Jr. (Guerard) fraudulently concealed transfers of money to the other respondents, Guerard’s wife and son. According to Carr’s complaint, Guerard concealed the transfers to avoid satisfaction of a judgment entered by confession on June 14, 1991.2 The circuit court granted Guerard’s motion for sum*153mary judgment, holding that Carr’s fraudulent-transfer action was, in reality, an action on the judgment…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Future Group, II v. NationsbankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  2. Commercial Credit Loans, Inc. v. RiddleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  3. Hardee v. LynchSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  4. Garrison v. OwensSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
  5. Walter J. Klein Co. v. KneeceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Timothy v. Pia Anderson Dorius Reynard MossUtah Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Rrr, Inc. v. ToggasDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  3. Gordon v. LancasterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2018
  4. In re DC Development, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2017
  5. Richardson v. ChamblessSupreme Court of Alabama · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API