Legal Opinion
United States v. Interstate General Co.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided June 12, 2001No. Civ. AW-96-1112, No. Cr. AW-95-0390PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WILLIAMS, District Judge.
Presently before this Court are Interstate General Company, et. al.’s (“Defendants”) Motion to Stay Time Limits in the Consent Decree, Motion to Vacate Order, and Motion for a Writ of Coram Nobis. On May 11, 2001, this Court held a hearing on the pending motions in the above captioned case. After hearing arguments from both parties and reviewing all pleadings in the matter, this Court will hold in abeyance the Defendants Motion to Stay Time Limits in the Consent Decree and deny the Defendants’ Motion to Vacate Order, and the Motion for a Writ of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County JailSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hess v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. United States Army Corps of EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Betty Brown v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. John A. Rapanos Judith A. Nelkie Rapanos Prodo, Inc. Rolling Meadows Hunt Club Pine River Bluff Estates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Diablo Grande, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2002
- United States v. KrilichDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
- Carabell v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
- FD & P Enterprises, Inc. v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.