Legal Opinion
United States v. John A. Rapanos Judith A. Nelkie Rapanos Prodo, Inc. Rolling Meadows Hunt Club Pine River Bluff Estates, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 26, 2004No. 03-1489PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
REEVES, District Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellee United States brought suit against the Defendants pursuant to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972, Pub.L. No. 92-500, 86 Stat. 817, as amended 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq., commonly known as the Clean Water Act (“CWA”). Defendants-Appellants John Rapanos, Judith Rapanos, Prodo, Inc., Rolling Meadows Hunt Club, and Pine River Bluff Estates, Inc. appeal the district court’s entry of judgment in favor of the United States. Prodo, Inc., Rolling Meadows Hunt Club, and Pine River Bluff Estates, Inc. are wholly owned by John and…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Kaiser Aetna v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Rapanos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Northern California River Watch v. City of HealdsburgCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Tohono O'Odham Nation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- June Carabell Keith Carabell Harvey Gordenker Frances Gordenker v. United States Army Corps of Engineers United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.