Legal Opinion
FD & P Enterprises, Inc. v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided January 15, 2003No. Civil Action 99-3500 (HAA)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
ACKERMAN, Senior District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment. For the reasons outlined below, Plaintiffs motion is DENIED.
I. Factual and Procedural Background
Plaintiff FD & P Enterprises (“FD & P”) is a corporation engaged in providing freight transportation services to the New York-New Jersey metropolitan area. FD & P owns a 100-acre property located on Secaucus Road in Jersey City, New Jersey (“the FD & P Property”). FD & P hopes to construct an intermodal rail facility on the FD & P Property, which would be used for…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Edward J. DeBartolo Corp. v. Florida Gulf Coast Building & Construction Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. John A. Rapanos Judith A. Nelkie Rapanos Prodo, Inc. Rolling Meadows Hunt Club Pine River Bluff Estates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- North Carolina Shellfish Growers Ass'n v. Holly Ridge Associates, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2003
- United States v. JonesDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2003
- National Ass'n of Home Builders v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- National Association of Home Builders v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010