Legal Opinion

Wilmington Amusement Co. v. Pacific Fire Insurance

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided June 20, 1941PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Layton, Chief Justice:

The demurrer challenges the sufficiency of the first count of the declaartion. It was alleged that on June 8, 1938, the defendant issued its policy insuring against loss by fire the plaintiff’s property in Wilmington, known as the Queen Theatre Building. On December 2, 1939, a fire occurred in a part of the building occupied by the plaintiff’s lessee. The plaintiff had no knowledge of the fire and resulting damage until March 15, 1940, for the reason that its lessee did not notify it of the fire until that time. *296Upon receipt of the information, the plaintiff gave…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. O'Reilly v. . Guardian Mutual Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Niagara Fire Ins. Co. v. PospisilCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  3. Emory v. Glens Falls InsuranceSuperior Court of Delaware · 1908
  4. Harris v. North British & Mercantile Ins.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1929
  5. Wilson v. Bethlehem Steel Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bradford, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity CompanySuperior Court of Delaware · 1972
  2. Home Indemnity Company v. WareDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1960
  3. Hughey v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1962
  4. Home Indemnity Co. v. WareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
  5. Lilly v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API