Legal Opinion

In re Anderson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 5, 1941PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

Application for leave to file petition for writ of habeas corpus in forma pauperis in this court is denied because without merit for two reasons: One, our power as a court to issue such writs is in aid of our appellate jurisdiction only. De Maurez v. Swope, 100 F.2d 530; Ferguson v. Swope, 9 Cir., 109 F.2d 152; De Maurez v. Swope, 9 Cir., 110 F.2d 564. Two, the lower federal courts should not consider an application for a writ of habeas corpus where the petitioner is detained under state process save in exceptional cases. Urquhart v. Brown, 205 U.S. 179, 27 S.Ct. 459, 51 L.Ed. 760; Ex parte…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Urquhart v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. De Maurez v. SwopeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
  3. Ex parte JeffersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  4. Ex parte PenneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  5. Maurez v. SwopeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HawkSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Hawk v. OlsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
  3. Edwards v. SchmidtDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1971
  4. Application of MiddlebrooksDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1950
  5. In re MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API