Legal Opinion
Maurez v. Swope
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 1, 1940PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARRECHT, Circuit Judge.
The petitioner has been before this court on four prior occasions, presenting substantially the same question in each application. DeMaurez v. Swope, Warden, 9 Cir., 100 F.2d 530; Id., 9 Cir., 104 F.2d 758; Ex parte Demaurez, 9 Cir., 106 F.2d 457; Id., unreported memorandum filed October 27, 1939. Three of these petitions were denied as being without merit. It is difficult td discover anything prayed for in this petition which is essentially different from that urged in the numerous prior petitions filed by this petitioner. As near as we can determine, this present…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Shreve v. CheesmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
- Plattner Implement Co. v. International Harvester Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- Hardy v. North Butte Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
- De Maurez v. SwopeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- De Maurez v. SwopeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hawk v. OlsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
- Walleck v. HudspethCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
- In re AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
- United States v. De MaurezDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1943
- Hawk v. OlsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.